1
Horsey, K, Rackley E. Tort Law. 8th ed. Oxford University Press 2023.
2
Quinn F. Elliott and Quinn’s tort law. Twelfth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2019. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5725745
3
What types of Interests are protected by tort? http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/02whattypes.mp3
4
What is Tort? Podcast. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/01whatistort1.mp3
5
Horsey, K, Rackley E. Tort Law. 8th ed. Oxford University Press 2023.
6
Quinn F. Elliott and Quinn’s tort law. Twelfth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2019. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5725745
7
Horsey, K, Rackley E. Tort Law. 8th ed. Oxford University Press 2023.
8
Quinn F. Elliott and Quinn’s tort law. Twelfth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2019. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5725745
9
Horsey, K, Rackley E. Tort Law. 6th ed. Oxford University Press 2019.
10
Quinn F. Elliott and Quinn’s tort law. Twelfth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2019. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5725745
11
Horsey, K, Rackley E. Tort Law. 8th ed. Oxford University Press 2023.
12
Quinn F. Elliott and Quinn’s tort law. Twelfth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2019. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5725745
13
Horsey, K, Rackley E. Tort Law. 8th ed. Oxford University Press 2023.
14
Quinn F. Elliott and Quinn’s tort law. Twelfth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2019. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5725745
15
Horsey, K, Rackley E. Tort Law. 8th ed. Oxford University Press 2023.
16
Quinn F. Elliott and Quinn’s tort law. Twelfth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2019. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5725745
17
Horsey, K, Rackley E. Tort Law. 8th ed. Oxford University Press 2023.
18
Quinn F. Elliott and Quinn’s tort law. Twelfth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2019. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5725745
19
Horsey, K, Rackley E. Tort Law. 8th ed. Oxford University Press 2023.
20
Quinn F. Elliott and Quinn’s tort law. Twelfth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2019. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5725745
21
Brennan C. Tort law directions. 9th edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2024.
22
Morris A. Spiralling or Stabilising? The Compensation Culture and Our Propensity to Claim Damages for Personal Injury. Modern Law Review 2007;70:349–78. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00642.x
23
Williams K. State of fear: Britain’s ‘compensation culture’ reviewed. Legal Studies 2005;25:499–514. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00680.x
24
Evolution of the tort of Negligence. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/09negligenceevolved.mp3
25
Mance, J. Ex Turpi Causa - When Latin Avoids Liability. Edinburgh Law Review 2014;18:175–92.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr18&id=174
26
Jonathan Morgan. Jus suum cuique. Law Quarterly Review
27
Loss of the Chance of Cure from Cancer. The Modern Law Review Published Online First: 2005.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.3699131&site=eds-live
28
Lost Causes in the House of Lords: Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services. The Modern Law Review Published Online First: 2003.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.1097628&site=eds-live
29
Wightman, John. Nuisance. The Environmental Tort? Hunter v Canary Wharf in the House of Lords. The Modern Law Review, 11/1/1998, Vol 1998;61.
30
Conor Gearty. The Place of Private Nuisance in a Modern Law of Torts. The Cambridge Law Journal 1989;48:214–42.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4507285?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
31
Maria Lee. What is private nuisance? Law Quarterly Review Published Online First: 2003.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=ICCA3E101E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
32
Liew YK. The Rule in Wilkinson v Downton: Conduct, Intention, and Justifiability. The Modern Law Review 2015;78:349–60. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12118
33
Public Law Liability: A Common Law Solution? https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4500825.pdf
34
Chapter 7: Duty of care problem areas (4:20). http://global.oup.com/uk/orc/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/
35
What is Tort. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/01whatistort1.mp3
36
Standard of care. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/13standardofcare.mp3
37
Evolution of the tort of Negligence. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/09negligenceevolved.mp3
38
Loss of chance. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/16recovery.mp3
39
Pure Economic Loss. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/ch07_duty_problems.mp3
40
Duty of care. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/ch04_duty.mp3
41
Cumulative Causes. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/17cumulative.mp3
42
R v F. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/ch14_rylands_fletcher.mp3
43
Novus Actus. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/19novusactus.mp3
44
Westlaw UK - legal research database. University login required off-campus. https://portal.roehampton.ac.uk/information/library/Pages/a-z-online-databases.aspx#w
45
Lexis Library - for legal resources and primary source material. University login required. https://portal.roehampton.ac.uk/information/library/Pages/a-z-online-databases.aspx#l
46
Nexis UK - Use this full-text database to access the title Lawyer 2B and to search across national and international newspaper and magazine titles. Login with university Username/Password via Shibboleth/ Academic Sign-In. Avoid blank boxes requiring an ID/Password. https://portal.roehampton.ac.uk/information/library/Pages/a-z-online-databases.aspx#n
47
Hein Online Law Journal Library - University login required off-campus. https://portal.roehampton.ac.uk/information/library/Pages/a-z-online-databases.aspx#h
48
Perry and another v Harris (a minor and a patient, suing by his mother and litigation friend, Harris). https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P54P-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
49
Lord Keith of Kinkel , Lord Brandon of Oakbrook , Lord Templeman , Lord Oliver of Aylmerton and Lord Goff of Chieveley 1988 Feb. 8, 9, 10; April 28(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 W.L.R. 1049.
50
Cole v Davis-Gilbert and Others. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4NGK-13D0-TWP1-X06V-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
51
Tate & Lyle Food & Distribution Ltd and Silvertown Services Lighterage Ltd v Greater London Council, and Port of London Authority. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4PN7-K4M0-TXX5-50WT-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
52
Laws and others v Florinplace Ltd and another. 1981. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-3KT0-TWP1-60HK-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
53
Halsey v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd. 1961. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PPB0-TWP1-61N6-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
54
Attorney-General (on the relation of Glamorgan County Council and Pontardawe Rural District Council) v PYA Quarries Ltd. 1957. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP40-TWP1-60XY-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
55
SHELFER v. CITY OF LONDON ELECTRIC LIGHTING COMPANY. [1894 S. 840.] MEUX’S BREWERY COMPANY v. CITY OF LONDON ELECTRIC LIGHTING COMPANY. [1894 M. 610.]. 1895. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JWD-4KM0-TXD6-Y0GS-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
56
ADAMS v. URSELL. [1912 A. 1680.]. 1913. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JWD-43K0-TXD6-Y02V-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
57
Delaware Mansions Ltd and another v Westminster City Council. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4DXH-MGX0-TWP1-714C-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
58
Lawrence and another v Fen Tigers Ltd and others. 2014. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5C3W-8501-DYBP-M2VB-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
59
Lippiatt and another v South Gloucestershire Council. 1999. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J90-TWP1-60SY-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
60
Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd and Another. 1954. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP20-TWP1-61BG-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
61
Miller and another v Jackson and another. 1977. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-3KP0-TWP1-601X-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
62
Khorasandjian v Bush. 1993. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-49G0-TWP1-60X7-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
63
Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd and Another. 1954. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP20-TWP1-61BG-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
64
Khorasandjian v Bush. 1993. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-49G0-TWP1-60X7-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
65
Dennis and another v Ministry of Defence. 2003. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4J44-1340-TX1N-H0F8-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
66
Marcic v Thames Water Utilities Ltd. 2004. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-7PB0-TWP1-60MB-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
67
Hatton and others v United Kingdom (App no 36022/97). https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4J54-TW60-TWP1-G0P5-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
68
Holbeck Hall Hotel Ltd and another v Scarborough Borough Council. 2000. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-7PB0-TWP1-60MJ-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
69
Malone v Laskey and another. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDM0-TWXJ-215V-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
70
Watson and another v Croft Promosport Ltd. 2009. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/7W2S-39H0-Y96Y-G1N7-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
71
Wandsworth London Borough Council v Railtrack plc[2001] EWCA Civ 1236. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K3D-RRF0-TXD5-X153-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
72
Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council and Another. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4DKC-18P0-TWP1-X0FS-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
73
Hopps v Mott MacDonald. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/7W77-B9G0-YBF6-73M4-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
74
GRANT v AUSTRALIAN KNITTING MILLS, LIMITED, AND OTHERS ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K4W-PD30-TXD8-61NC-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
75
Bolitho (Administratrix of the Estate of Patrick Nigel Bolitho (deceased)) v City and Hackney Health Authority. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/59MP-VG81-DYBP-P4FV-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
76
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee. 1957. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP50-TWP1-60FY-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
77
OVERSEAS TANKSHIP (U.K.) LTD. APPELLANTS; AND MORTS DOCK & ENGINEERING CO. LTD. RESPONDENTS. (THE WAGON MOUND.). 1961. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5FJH-TCW1-F00Y-N13N-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
78
Wooldridge v Sumner and Another. 1962. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP80-TWP1-6186-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
79
Shakoor (administratrix of the estate of Shakoor, (deceased) v Situ (t/a Eternal Health Company). https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P4W6-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
80
Mullin v Richards. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/59MP-VFS1-DYBP-P0F3-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
81
ROE v. MINISTER OF HEALTH AND ANOTHER.; WOOLLEY v. SAME. 1954. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5FJH-TCP1-F00Y-N4SC-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
82
MUIR AND OTHERS, TRUSTEES v CITY OF GLASGOW BANK AND LIQUIDATORS. 1879. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JT8-8WM0-TXD8-61CH-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
83
Howarth D. Many Duties of Care--Or A Duty of Care? Notes from the Underground. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2006;26:449–72. doi:10.1093/ojls/gql014
84
Rondel v Worsley. 1967. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-35T0-TWP1-60G1-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
85
Cole v Davis-Gilbert and ors. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/55Y7-JW41-DYBP-N3YP-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
86
Henderson, J. New Zealand Accident Compensation Reform. University of Chicago Law Review 1981;48:781–801.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/uclr48&id=797
87
Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council and Another. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4DKC-18P0-TWP1-X0FS-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
88
READ v J. LYONS & COMPANY, LIMITED . https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K4W-PD30-TXD8-60FM-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
89
Attorney-General v Corke (On Relation of Bromley Rural District Council). https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDH0-TWXJ-21G3-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
90
GILES v. WALKER. 1890. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K3D-4R70-TXD5-X03H-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
91
Crowhurst v Amersham Burial Board. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDJ0-TWXJ-20HG-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
92
BRITISH CELANESE LTD. v. A. H. HUNT (CAPACITORS) LTD. 1969. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5FJH-TCR1-F00Y-N0X3-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
93
Murphy J. The Merits of Rylands v Fletcher. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2004;24:643–69. doi:10.1093/ojls/24.4.643
94
Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/531V-8V31-DYJ0-81TW-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
95
Charing Cross, West End, and City Electricity Supply Co, Ltd v London Hydraulic Power Co. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDK0-TWXJ-219G-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
96
CARSTAIRS AND ANOTHER v. TAYLOR. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JKJ-1J00-TXD6-H1FC-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
97
Green v Chelsea Waterworks Co. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDM0-TWXJ-20XW-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
98
Transco plc (formerly BG plc and BG Transco plc) v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/59MP-VFS1-DYBP-P01J-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
99
DUNN AND ANOTHER v. THE COMPANY OF PROPRIETORS OF THE BIRMINGHAM CANAL NAVIGATION. 1872. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JTB-2380-TXD5-X0K0-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
100
Rickards v Lothian. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDH0-TWXJ-20PH-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
101
EASTERN AND SOUTH AFRICAN TELEGRAPH COMPANY, LIMITED PLAINTIFFS; AND CAPE TOWN TRAMWAYS COMPANIES, LIMITED DEFENDANTS. ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE CAPE OF GOOD HOPE. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K4W-PD60-TXD8-610G-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
102
Rickards v Lothian. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDH0-TWXJ-20PH-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
103
NICHOLS v. MARSLAND. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JKJ-1HY0-TXD6-H17J-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
104
Rickards v Lothian. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDH0-TWXJ-20PH-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
105
MASON v. LEVY AUTO PARTS OF ENGLAND LTD. 1967. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K4F-RWN0-TXD5-X06R-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
106
PERRY v. KENDRICKS TRANSPORT LTD. 1956. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5FJH-TCT1-F00Y-N4FJ-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
107
MONSON v. TUSSAUDS LIMITED. MONSON v. LOUIS TUSSAUD. 1894. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K4F-RWM0-TXD5-X06P-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
108
Lewis and Another v Daily Telegraph Ltd and Another (No 2). 1964. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP90-TWP1-615N-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
109
Sim v Stretch. 1936. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-NP20-TWP1-611S-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
110
DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL APPELLANT AND TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD. AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K4W-PD30-TXD8-60K3-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
111
E. HULTON & CO. v JONES. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K4W-PD50-TXD8-606N-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
112
Slipper v British Broadcasting Corporation. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4DKC-18H0-TWP1-X17W-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
113
BYRNE v. DEANE. [1935. B. 3406.]. 1937. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K4F-RWR0-TXD5-X10S-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
114
Charleston and another v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another. 1995. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J90-TWP1-606S-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
115
Lewis and Another v Daily Telegraph Ltd and Another (No 2). 1964. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP90-TWP1-615N-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
116
Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers, Ltd. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDM0-TWXJ-205R-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
117
Theaker v Richardson. 1962. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PPB0-TWP1-61FG-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
118
Berkoff v Burchill and Another. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4DKC-18V0-TWP1-X11N-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
119
Kemsley v Foot and Others. 1952. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP30-TWP1-6112-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
120
London Artists Ltd v Littler; [And Associated Actions]. 1969. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-35S0-TWP1-61GN-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
121
Thomas v Bradbury, Agnew & Co, Ltd and another. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDM0-TWXJ-217Y-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
122
Roberts and another v Gable and others. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/59MP-VFW1-DYBP-P0MX-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
123
Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5DRY-NDR1-F0JY-C3RH-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
124
Tolley v JS Fry & Sons Ltd. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDJ0-TWXJ-20DP-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
125
Tolley v JS Fry & Sons Ltd. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDJ0-TWXJ-20DP-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
126
Tolley v JS Fry & Sons Ltd. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDJ0-TWXJ-20DP-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
127
Huth v Huth. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDM0-TWXJ-20DV-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
128
VIZETELLY v. MUDIE’S SELECT LIBRARY, LIMITED. 1900. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K4F-RWM0-TXD5-X08N-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
129
Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd and another. 1971. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-35T0-TWP1-618V-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
130
KNUPPFER v. LONDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS, LIMITED. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K3D-RRF0-TXD5-X09V-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
131
Godfrey v Demon Internet Limited. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/59MP-VGC1-DYBP-P4D5-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
132
Hartt v Newspaper Publishing plc & Others. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4PN7-S5H0-TXX5-501S-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
133
PERRY v. KENDRICKS TRANSPORT LTD. 1956. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5FJH-TCT1-F00Y-N4FJ-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
134
SMEATON v. ILFORD CORPORATION. [1953 S. No. 2308.]. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4JT8-6CY0-TXD6-Y0S4-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
135
Lippiatt and another v South Gloucestershire Council. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FD5-X820-TWP1-N1BK-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
136
Musgrove v Pandelis. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FFM0-TWXJ-20K1-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
137
Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5J9S-1RY1-DYBP-W34C-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
138
Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd and another. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4DXH-MGX0-TWP1-70P5-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
139
HOME OFFICE APPELLANTS AND DORSET YACHT CO. LTD. RESPONDENTS [ON APPEAL FROM DOREST YACHT CO. LTD. v. HOME OFFICE]. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4K4W-PD30-TXD8-61HR-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
140
Arthur JS Hall & Co v Simons; Barratt v Ansell and others (t/a Woolf Seddon (a firm));Harris v Scholfield Roberts and Hill. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/59MP-VFT1-DYBP-P2CX-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
141
*Jones v Kaney. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/52HB-SD91-DYBP-N0N8-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
142
Caparo Industries plc v Dickman and others. 1990. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-49F0-TWP1-607B-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
143
Murphy v Brentwood District Council. 1990. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-49G0-TWP1-60B9-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
144
Perry and another v Harris (a minor and a patient, suing by his mother and litigation friend, Harris). https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P54P-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
145
MARC RICH & CO. A.G. and Others v BISHOP ROCK MARINE CO. LTD. 1995. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5F50-BF31-F00Y-N0B7-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
146
Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd and another. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4DXH-MGX0-TWP1-70P5-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
147
Smith JC, Burns P. DONOGHUE v. STEVENSON-THE NOT SO GOLDEN ANNIVERSARY. The Modern Law Review 1983;46:147–63. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1983.tb02511.x
148
Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDJ0-TWXJ-20YD-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
149
ROE v. MINISTER OF HEALTH AND ANOTHER.; WOOLLEY v. SAME. 1954. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5FJH-TCP1-F00Y-N4SC-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
150
Paris v Stepney Borough Council. 1951. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP30-TWP1-61KY-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
151
Nettleship v Weston. 1971. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-3KN0-TWP1-614K-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
152
ROBERTS AND OTHERS v. RAMSBOTTOM. 1980. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5F7T-DV01-F00Y-N4T5-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
153
WATT v. HERTFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL. 1954. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5FJH-TCP1-F00Y-N543-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
154
Vowles v Evans and another. 2003. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5F3S-9PV1-F00Y-N2RF-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
155
Wooldridge v Sumner and Another. 1962. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP80-TWP1-6186-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
156
Bolton and Others v Stone. 1951. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP30-TWP1-603W-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
157
Latimer v AEC Ltd. 1953. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CRN-PP30-TWP1-60K4-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
158
OVERSEAS TANKSHIP (U.K.) LTD. v MORTS DOCK & ENGINEERING CO. LTD. (THE WAGON MOUND.). 1961. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5FJH-TCW1-F00Y-N13N-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
159
Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors and others. 1985. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-3KV0-TWP1-60D3-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
160
MANSFIELD and Another v. WEETABIX LTD. and Another. 1998. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5F4V-GGX1-F00Y-N33G-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
161
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (General Medical Council intervening). https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/5HT7-5N61-F02Y-M1BD-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
162
Donoghue (or McAlister) v Stevenson. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FPP-FDJ0-TWXJ-20X4-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
163
Van Colle and another v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Secretary of State for the Home Department and others intervening)Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Secretary of State for the Home Department and others intervening). https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/7VBG-RMR0-Y9Y6-G0SS-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
164
What is Tort. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/01whatistort1.mp3
165
R v F. http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/orc/resources/law/tort/bermingham_directions5e/student/podcasts/ch14_rylands_fletcher.mp3
166
Mance, J. Ex Turpi Causa - When Latin Avoids Liability. Edinburgh Law Review 2014;18:175–92.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr18&id=174
167
Poppleton v Trustees of Portsmouth Youth Activities Committee. https://plus-lexis-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/uk/id/55Y7-JST1-DYBP-N4D3-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=9H6FNF57682
168
OSCOLA - Oxford University Standard for the Citation of Legal Authorities (2012) 4th Edition. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/oscola_4th_edn_hart_2012.pdf
169
OSCOLA Quick Reference (one page) Guide. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/oscola_4th_edn_hart_2012quickreferenceguide.pdf
170
Nolan D, Meredith S. OSCOLA: Oxford University Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities. 4th ed. [Oxford?]: : Hart 2012. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/oscola
171
Oxford Law : OSCOLA FAQs. This webpage is not an authoritative source but you may find the FAQs useful. The suggestions on this page have not yet been discussed and approved by the OSCOLA editorial board. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/oscola-faqs
