1
Dickerson, Paul. Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. 1st ed. New York: : Pearson Education 2012. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9781408269848&uid=^u
2
Dickerson, Paul. Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2012.
3
Dickerson, Paul. Social influence and intragroup processes (Chapter 10). In: Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2012. 352–89.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9781408269848&uid=^u
4
Milgram, Stanley. Behavioral Study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963;67:371–8.
5
Milgram, Stanley. Obedience to authority: an experimental view. [New] ed. London: : Pinter & Martin 2010.
6
Zimbardo, Philip G. The Lucifer effect: how good people turn evil. London: : Random House 2007.
7
Stanley Milgram.com. http://www.stanleymilgram.com/
8
Milgram experiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment
9
The Stanford Prison Experiment: A Simulation Study of the Psychology of Imprisonment. http://www.prisonexp.org/
10
Philip G. Zimbardo | Professor Emeritus of Psychology, Stanford University. http://www.zimbardo.com/
11
Dickerson, Paul. Attribution (Chapter 4). In: Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2012. 110–49.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9781408269848&uid=^u
12
Dickerson, Paul. Explanatory talk (Chapter 5). In: Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2012. 150–85.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9781408269848&uid=^u
13
Antaki, Charles. Explaining and arguing: the social organization of accounts. London: : Sage 1994.
14
Brown, Roger. Social psychology. 2nd ed. New York: : Free Press 1986.
15
Dickerson, Paul. ‘I did it for the nation’: Repertoires of intent in televised political discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology 1998;37:477–94. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01185.x
16
Edwards, Derek, Potter, Jonathan. Discursive psychology. London: : Sage Pubns 1992.
17
Hewstone, Miles. Causal attribution: from cognitive processes to collective beliefs. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1989.
18
Dickerson, Paul. Attitude change and persuasion (chapter 6). In: Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2012. 186–223.
19
Dickerson, Paul. ‘It’s not just me who’s saying this…’ The deployment of cited others in televised political discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology 1997;36:33–48. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01117.x
20
Fiske, Susan T., Taylor, Shelley E. Social cognition. 2nd ed. New York: : McGraw-Hill 1991.
21
Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T., Goldman, Rachel. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981;41:847–55.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1982-09821-001&site=ehost-live
22
Potter, Jonathan. Discursive Social Psychology: From Attitudes to Evaluative Practices. European Review of Social Psychology 1998;9:233–66. doi:10.1080/14792779843000090
23
Wiggins, Sally, Potter, Jonathan. Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology 2003;42:513–31. doi:10.1348/014466603322595257
24
Publications - Richard E. Petty. http://www.psy.ohio-state.edu/petty/pubs.html
25
Jonathan Potter – Articles. http://homepages.lboro.ac.uk/~ssjap/JP%2520Articles/jparticles.htm
26
Dickerson, Paul. Stereotypes and prejudice (chapter 7). In: Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2012. 224–63.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9781408269848&uid=^u
27
Tileaga, C. Accounting for extreme prejudice and legitimating blame in talk about the Romanies. Discourse & Society 2005;16:603–24. doi:10.1177/0957926505054938
28
Blaine, Bruce Evan. Understanding the psychology of diversity. London: : SAGE 2007. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1046445
29
Brown, Rupert. Prejudice: its social psychology. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9781444324600&uid=^u
30
Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Greenwald, Anthony G. On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001;81:800–14.
31
Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Rivera, Luis M. From automatic antigay prejudice to behavior: The moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006;91:268–80.
32
Dovidio, John F., Gaertner, Samuel L. Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Orlando,Fla: : Academic Press 1986.
33
Gaertner, Samuel L., McLaughlin, John P. Racial Stereotypes: Associations and Ascriptions of Positive and Negative Characteristics. Social Psychology Quarterly 1983;46:23–30.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3033657
34
Dickerson, Paul. Aggression and intergroup conflict (chapter 9). In: Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2012. 308–51.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9781408269848&uid=^u
35
Brown, Rupert. Group processes: dynamics within and between groups. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Blackwell 2000.
36
Dickerson, Paul. ‘But I’m different to them’: Constructing contrasts between self and others in talk-in-interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology 2000;39:381–98. doi:10.1348/014466600164552
37
Pehrson, Samuel, Brown, Rupert, Zagefka, Hanna. When does national identification lead to the rejection of immigrants? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence for the role of essentialist in-group definitions. British Journal of Social Psychology 2009;48:61–76. doi:10.1348/014466608X288827
38
Dickerson, Paul. Communication and interaction. In: Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2012. 390–426.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9781408269848&uid=^u
39
Beattie, Geoffrey. Visible thought: the new psychology of body language. London: : Routledge 2003.
40
Dickerson, Paul, Stribling, Penny, Rae, John. Tapping into interaction: How children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders design and place tapping in relation to activities in progress. Gesture 2007;7:271–303.
41
Goodwin, Charles. Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction 1995;28:233–60.
42
Potter, Jonathan. Cognition and conversation. Discourse Studies 2006;8:131–40. doi:10.1177/1461445606059562
43
Jonathan Potter : articles. http://homepages.lboro.ac.uk/~ssjap/JP%2520Articles/jparticles.htm
44
Dickerson, Paul. Attraction and relationships (chapter 3). In: Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2012. 74–109.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9781408269848&uid=^u
45
Aumer-Ryan, Katherine, Hatfield, Elaine, Frey, Rosemary. Examining Equity Theory across Cultures. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships 2007;1:61–75. doi:10.5964/ijpr.v1i1.5
46
Goodwin, Robin, ebrary, Inc. Personal relationships across cultures. London: : Routledge 1999. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10054865
47
Hatfield, Elaine, Lambert, Philip, Traupmann, Jane, et al. Equity and Sexual Satisfaction in Recently Married Couples. The Journal of Sex Research 1982;18:18–32.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3812508
48
Traupmann, J., Hatfield, E., Wexler, P. Equity and sexual satisfaction in dating couples. British journal of social psychology 1983;22:33–40.
49
Elaine Hatfield - Home. http://www.elainehatfield.com/
50
Dickerson, Paul. Prosocial behaviour (chapter 8). In: Social psychology: traditional and critical perspectives. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2012. 264–307.https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9781408269848&uid=^u
51
Dovidio, John F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., et al. The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum 2006. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5058133
52
Manning, Rachel, Levine, Mark, Collins, Alan. The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping : The parable of the 38 witnesses. American Psychologist 2007;62:555–62.
53
Piliavin, Irving M., Rodin, Judith, Piliavin, Jane A. Good Samaritanism: An underground phenomenon? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969;13:289–99.