1
Shakespeare W. The Norton Shakespeare. Third Edition. New York: : W.W. Norton & Company 2016. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/213586
2
Cousins AD, Derrin D, editors. Shakespeare and the soliloquy in early modern English drama. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5473051
3
Shakespeare W, Greenblatt S, Cohen W, et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Comedies. 3rd edition. New York: : W. W. Norton 2016.
4
Shakespeare W, Greenblatt S, Cohen W, et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Tragedies. 3rd edition. New York: : W. W. Norton 2016.
5
Shakespeare W, Greenblatt S, Cohen W, et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Histories. 3rd ed. New York: : W. W. Norton 2016.
6
Shakespeare W, Greenblatt S, Cohen W, et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Romances and poems. 3rd ed. New York: : W. W. Norton 2016.
7
Gabriel Egan. The New Oxford Shakespeare: Complete Set: Modern Critical Edition, Critical Reference Edition, Authorship Companion. OUP Oxford; Critical edition 27AD. https://www.amazon.co.uk/New-Oxford-Shakespeare-Reference-Authorship/dp/0198791321/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1547594552&sr=8-2&keywords=new+oxford+shakespeare+terri+bourus
8
Shakespeare W, Greenblatt S, Cohen W, et al. The Norton Shakespeare: based on the Oxford edition. 2nd ed. New York: : W. W. Norton 2008.
9
Wells SW, Orlin LC. Shakespeare: an Oxford guide. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
10
Smith E. Cambridge introduction to Shakespeare. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9780511321368&uid=^u
11
Erne L. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : New York 2013.
12
Ryan K. Shakespeare. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2002. https://web-a-ebscohost-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=43750cbe-f60b-44f0-8801-f837b890d96f%40sessionmgr4008&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=78756&db=nlebk
13
Margreta de Grazia and Peter Stallybrass. The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text. Shakespeare Quarterly 1993;44:255–83.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2871419?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
14
Palfrey S, Stern T. Shakespeare in parts. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=415764
15
Smith EJ. Shakespeare’s First Folio : four centuries of an iconic book. Oxford: : Open University Press 2016.
16
Franssen P. Shakespeare’s literary lives : theauthor as character in fiction andfilm. Cambridge, United Kingdom: : Cambridge University Press 2016. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316410851
17
Archer JEG. Intellectual and cultural world ofthe early modern Inns of Court. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2011.
18
Shakespeare W, Bate J. Titus Andronicus. London: : The Arden Shakespeare/Thomson Learning 2006.
19
Miola RS. Shakespeare’s Rome. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1983.
20
Aebischer P. Shakespeare’s violated bodies: stage and screen performance. Cambridge, U.K.: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
21
Chernaik WL. The myth of Rome in Shakespeare and his contemporaries. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10470742
22
Kahn C. Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. London: : Routledge 1997. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=170363
23
Deborah Willis. ‘The Gnawing Vulture’: Revenge, Trauma Theory, and ‘Titus Andronicus’. Shakespeare Quarterly 2002;53:21–52.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3844038?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
24
Leggatt A. Shakespeare’s tragedies: violation and identity. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483660
25
Miola RS. Shakespeare’s Rome. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1983.
26
Chernaik WL. The myth of Rome in Shakespeare and his contemporaries. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10470742
27
Kahn C. Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. London: : Routledge 1997. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=170363
28
Zander H. Julius Caesar: new critical essays. New York: : Routledge 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=241952
29
Wills G, ebrary, Inc. Rome and rhetoric: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. New Haven, CT: : Yale University Press 2011. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10512355
30
Shakespeare W. Much ado about nothing. Revised edition. London: : Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare 2016.
31
Cook AJ. Making a Match: Courtship in Shakespeare and His Society. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2014. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=791092&site=ehost-live
32
Neely CT. Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. Illini Books ed. Urbana: : University of Illinois Press 1993.
33
Cook C. ‘The Sign and Semblance of Her Honor’: Reading Gender Difference in Much Ado about Nothing. PMLA 1986;101. doi:10.2307/462403
34
Shakespeare W, Taylor G. Henry V. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
35
Leggatt A. Shakespeare’s political drama: the history plays and the Roman plays. London: : Routledge 1988.
36
Howard JE, Rackin P. Engendering a nation: a feminist account of Shakespeare’s English histories (electronic resource). London [England]: : Routledge 1997. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10057214
37
Michael Neill. Broken English and Broken Irish: Nation, Language, and the Optic of Power in Shakespeare’s Histories. Shakespeare Quarterly 1994;45:1–32.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2871290?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
38
Lawrence Danson. Henry V: King, Chorus, and Critics. Shakespeare Quarterly 1983;34:27–43.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2870218?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
39
Olivier LO. Henry V. 2003.
40
Shakespeare W, Thompson A, Taylor N. Hamlet. London: : Arden Shakespeare 2006.
41
Shakespeare W, Thompson A, Taylor N. Hamlet: the texts of 1603 and 1623. London: : Arden Shakespeare 2006.
42
Shakespeare W. Hamlet. Oxford ; New York: : Oxford University Press 2008.
43
Shakespeare W, Thompson (Ed) A, Taylor (Ed) N. Hamlet (The First Folio, 1623) (electronic resource). London: : Arden Shakespeare 2006. doi:10.5040/9781408188125.00000040
44
Shakespeare W, Thompson (Ed) A, Taylor (Ed) N. Hamlet (The First Quarto; 1603) (electronic resource). In: Hamlet: the texts of 1603 and 1623. London: : Arden 2006. doi:10.5040/9781408188125.00000018
45
Shakespeare W, Thompson (Ed) A, Taylor (Ed) N. Hamlet (The Second Quarto, 1604–05) (electronic resource). London: : Arden Shakespeare 2006. doi:10.5040/9781408160404.00000005
46
Thompson A. Hamlet: A Critical Reader. London: : Bloomsbury Publishing 2016.
47
Mercer P. Hamlet and the acting of revenge. London: : Macmillan 1987.
48
Greenblatt S. Hamlet in purgatory (electronic resource). [New] edition. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2013. https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1275329
49
Thornton Burnett M. The Heart of the Mystery: Hamlet and Secrets. In: New essays on Hamlet. New York: : AMS Press 1994. 21–46.
50
Pirie D. Hamlet without the Prince. Critical Quarterly 1972;14:293–314.
51
Cousins AD; D. Shakespeare and the soliloquy in early modern English drama. New York, USA: : Cambridge University Press 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5473051
52
Parker PA, Hartman GH. Shakespeare and the question of theory (electronic resource). New York: : Methuen 1985. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10097432
53
Shakespeare W, Snyder S. All’s well that ends well. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1993.
54
Ure P. William Shakespeare: the problem plays -Troilus and Cressida - all’s well that ends well - Measure for Measure - Timon of Athens. London: : Published for The British Council and The National Book League by Longman 1964.
55
Thomas V. The moral universe of Shakespeare’s problem plays. London: : Croom Helm 1987.
56
David McCandless. Helena’s Bed-trick: Gender and Performance in All’s Well That Ends Well. Shakespeare Quarterly 1994;45:449–68.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2870966?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
57
Muir K, International Shakespeare Conference. Shakespeare survey: an annual survey of Shakespearian study & production, 22. London: : Cambridge U.P 1969.
58
Shakespeare W, Foakes RA. King Lear (electronic resource). New ed. Walton-on-Thames: : Nelson 1997. http://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/plays/king-lear-iid-130992
59
Kingsley-Smith J. ‘Hereafter, in a Better World Than This’: The End of Exile in As You Like It and King Lear. In: Shakespeare’s drama of exile. London: : Macmillan 2003. 106–36.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=549ab7ae-f34a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
60
Colie RL, Flahiff FT. Some facets of ‘King Lear’: essays in prismatic criticism. London: : Heinemann Educational 1974.
61
Taylor G, Warren M. The Division of the kingdoms: Shakespeare’s two versions of King Lear. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: : Clarendon Press 1983.
62
Ellis A. Old age, masculinity, and early modern drama: comic elders on the Italian and Shakespearean stage. Farnham: : Ashgate 2009.
63
Adelman J. Suffocating mothers: fantasies of maternal origin in Shakespeare’s plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. New York: : Routledge 1992.
64
Michael Neill. ‘In Everything Illegitimate’: Imagining the Bastard in Renaissance Drama. The Yearbook of English Studies 1993;23:270–92.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3507984?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
65
Alfar CL. Looking for Goneril and Regan. In: Privacy, domesticity, and women in early modern England. Aldershot, Hants, U.K.: : Ashgate 2003. 167–9.
66
Shakespearean sensations : experiencing literature in early modern England. First paperback edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: : Cambridge University Press 2015.
67
Shakespeare W, Neill M. Anthony and Cleopatra. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
68
Loomba A. The Imperial Romance of Anthony and Cleopatra. In: Shakespeare, Race, and Colonialism. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2002. 112–34.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6714d9d4-4ad4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
69
Kahn C. Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. London: : Routledge 1997.
70
Bloom H. William Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra. New York: : Chelsea House 1988.
71
Stanton K. Shakespeare’s ’whores’ : erotics, politics and poetics. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014.
72
Shakespeare W, Orgel S. The winter’s tale. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1996.
73
Thorne A. Shakespeare’s romances. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2003.
74
McMullan G. Shakespeare and the idea of late writing: authorship in the proximity of death. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483790
75
Adelman J. Suffocating mothers: fantasies of maternal origin in Shakespeare’s plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. New York: : Routledge 1992.
76
Neely CT. Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. Illini Books ed. Urbana: : University of Illinois Press 1993.
77
Walter S. H. Lim. Knowledge and Belief in ‘The Winter’s Tale’. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 2001;41:317–34.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1556191?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
78
Leggatt A. Shakespeare’s tragedies: violation and identity. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483660
79
Deborah Willis. ‘The Gnawing Vulture’: Revenge, Trauma Theory, and ‘Titus Andronicus’. Shakespeare Quarterly 2002;53:21–52.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3844038?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
80
Shakespeare W, Bate J. Titus Andronicus. London: : The Arden Shakespeare/Thomson Learning 2006.
81
Zander H. Julius Caesar: new critical essays. New York: : Routledge 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=241952
82
Wills G, ebrary, Inc. Rome and rhetoric: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. New Haven, CT: : Yale University Press 2011. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10512355
83
Shakespeare W. Much ado about nothing. Revised edition. London: : Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare 2016.
84
Cook AJ. Making a Match: Courtship in Shakespeare and His Society. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2014. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=791092&site=ehost-live
85
Neely CT. Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. Illini Books ed. Urbana: : University of Illinois Press 1993.
86
Cook C. ‘The Sign and Semblance of Her Honor’: Reading Gender Difference in Much Ado about Nothing. PMLA 1986;101. doi:10.2307/462403
87
Kingsley-Smith J. ‘Hereafter, in a Better World Than This’: The End of Exile in As You Like It and King Lear. In: Shakespeare’s drama of exile. London: : Macmillan 2003. 106–36.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=549ab7ae-f34a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
88
Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive | by Michael John Goodman. https://shakespeareillustration.org/
