Bibliography for Shakespeare: Page and Stage (ENG020X340S) BETA

1.

Shakespeare, W.: The Norton Shakespeare. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2016).

2.

Cousins, A.D., Derrin, D. eds: Shakespeare and the soliloquy in early modern English drama. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018).

3.

Shakespeare, W., Greenblatt, S., Cohen, W., Gossett, S., Howard, J.E., Maus, K.E., McMullan, G.: The Norton Shakespeare: Comedies. W. W. Norton, New York (2016).

4.

Shakespeare, W., Greenblatt, S., Cohen, W., Gossett, S., Howard, J.E., Maus, K.E., McMullan, G., Gurr, A.: The Norton Shakespeare: Tragedies. W. W. Norton, New York (2016).

5.

Shakespeare, W., Greenblatt, S., Cohen, W., Gossett, S., Howard, J.E., Maus, K.E., McMullan, G.: The Norton Shakespeare: Histories. W. W. Norton, New York (2016).

6.

Shakespeare, W., Greenblatt, S., Cohen, W., Gossett, S., Howard, J.E., Maus, K.E., McMullan, G.: The Norton Shakespeare: Romances and poems. W. W. Norton, New York (2016).

7.

Gabriel Egan: The New Oxford Shakespeare: Complete Set: Modern Critical Edition, Critical Reference Edition, Authorship Companion. OUP Oxford; Critical edition (27)AD.

8.

Shakespeare, W., Greenblatt, S., Cohen, W., Howard, J.E., Maus, K.E., Gurr, A.: The Norton Shakespeare: based on the Oxford edition. W. W. Norton, New York (2008).

9.

Wells, S.W., Orlin, L.C.: Shakespeare: an Oxford guide. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).

10.

Smith, E.: Cambridge introduction to Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).

11.

Erne, L.: Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist. New York, Cambridge (2013).

12.

Ryan, K.: Shakespeare. Palgrave, Basingstoke (2002).

13.

Margreta de Grazia and Peter Stallybrass: The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text. Shakespeare Quarterly. 44, 255–283 (1993).

14.

Palfrey, S., Stern, T.: Shakespeare in parts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).

15.

Smith, E.J.: Shakespeare’s First Folio : four centuries of an iconic book. Open University Press, Oxford (2016).

16.

Franssen, P.: Shakespeare’s literary lives : theauthor as character in fiction andfilm. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom (2016).

17.

Archer, J.E.G.: Intellectual and cultural world ofthe early modern Inns of Court. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2011).

18.

Shakespeare, W., Bate, J.: Titus Andronicus. The Arden Shakespeare/Thomson Learning, London (2006).

19.

Miola, R.S.: Shakespeare’s Rome. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983).

20.

Aebischer, P.: Shakespeare’s violated bodies: stage and screen performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2004).

21.

Chernaik, W.L.: The myth of Rome in Shakespeare and his contemporaries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).

22.

Kahn, C.: Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. Routledge, London (1997).

23.

Deborah Willis: ‘The Gnawing Vulture’: Revenge, Trauma Theory, and ‘Titus Andronicus’. Shakespeare Quarterly. 53, 21–52 (2002).

24.

Leggatt, A.: Shakespeare’s tragedies: violation and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).

25.

Miola, R.S.: Shakespeare’s Rome. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983).

26.

Chernaik, W.L.: The myth of Rome in Shakespeare and his contemporaries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).

27.

Kahn, C.: Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. Routledge, London (1997).

28.

Zander, H.: Julius Caesar: new critical essays. Routledge, New York (2005).

29.

Wills, G., ebrary, Inc: Rome and rhetoric: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (2011).

30.

Shakespeare, W.: Much ado about nothing. Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, London (2016).

31.

Cook, A.J.: Making a Match: Courtship in Shakespeare and His Society. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2014).

32.

Neely, C.T.: Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1993).

33.

Cook, C.: ‘The Sign and Semblance of Her Honor’: Reading Gender Difference in Much Ado about Nothing. PMLA. 101, (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/462403.

34.

Shakespeare, W., Taylor, G.: Henry V. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).

35.

Leggatt, A.: Shakespeare’s political drama: the history plays and the Roman plays. Routledge, London (1988).

36.

Howard, J.E., Rackin, P.: Engendering a nation: a feminist account of Shakespeare’s English histories (electronic resource). Routledge, London [England] (1997).

37.

Michael Neill: Broken English and Broken Irish: Nation, Language, and the Optic of Power in Shakespeare’s Histories. Shakespeare Quarterly. 45, 1–32 (1994).

38.

Lawrence Danson: Henry V: King, Chorus, and Critics. Shakespeare Quarterly. 34, 27–43 (1983).

39.

Olivier, L.O.: Henry V, (2003).

40.

Shakespeare, W., Thompson, A., Taylor, N.: Hamlet. Arden Shakespeare, London (2006).

41.

Shakespeare, W., Thompson, A., Taylor, N.: Hamlet: the texts of 1603 and 1623. Arden Shakespeare, London (2006).

42.

Shakespeare, W.: Hamlet. Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York (2008).

43.

Shakespeare, W., Thompson (Ed), A., Taylor (Ed), N.: Hamlet (The First Folio, 1623) (electronic resource). Arden Shakespeare, London (2006). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781408188125.00000040.

44.

Shakespeare, W., Thompson (Ed), A., Taylor (Ed), N.: Hamlet (The First Quarto; 1603) (electronic resource). In: Hamlet: the texts of 1603 and 1623. Arden, London (2006). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781408188125.00000018.

45.

Shakespeare, W., Thompson (Ed), A., Taylor (Ed), N.: Hamlet (The Second Quarto, 1604–05) (electronic resource). Arden Shakespeare, London (2006). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781408160404.00000005.

46.

Thompson, A.: Hamlet: A Critical Reader. Bloomsbury Publishing, London (2016).

47.

Mercer, P.: Hamlet and the acting of revenge. Macmillan, London (1987).

48.

Greenblatt, S.: Hamlet in purgatory (electronic resource). Princeton University Press, Princeton (2013).

49.

Thornton Burnett, M.: The Heart of the Mystery: Hamlet and Secrets. In: New essays on Hamlet. pp. 21–46. AMS Press, New York (1994).

50.

Pirie, D.: Hamlet without the Prince. Critical Quarterly. 14, 293–314 (1972).

51.

Cousins, A.D.; D.: Shakespeare and the soliloquy in early modern English drama. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA (2018).

52.

Parker, P.A., Hartman, G.H.: Shakespeare and the question of theory (electronic resource). Methuen, New York (1985).

53.

Shakespeare, W., Snyder, S.: All’s well that ends well. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1993).

54.

Ure, P.: William Shakespeare: the problem plays -Troilus and Cressida - all’s well that ends well - Measure for Measure - Timon of Athens. Published for The British Council and The National Book League by Longman, London (1964).

55.

Thomas, V.: The moral universe of Shakespeare’s problem plays. Croom Helm, London (1987).

56.

David McCandless: Helena’s Bed-trick: Gender and Performance in All’s Well That Ends Well. Shakespeare Quarterly. 45, 449–468 (1994).

57.

Muir, K., International Shakespeare Conference: Shakespeare survey: an annual survey of Shakespearian study & production, 22. Cambridge U.P, London (1969).

58.

Shakespeare, W., Foakes, R.A.: King Lear (electronic resource). Nelson, Walton-on-Thames (1997).

59.

Kingsley-Smith, J.: ‘Hereafter, in a Better World Than This’: The End of Exile in As You Like It and King Lear. In: Shakespeare’s drama of exile. pp. 106–136. Macmillan, London (2003).

60.

Colie, R.L., Flahiff, F.T.: Some facets of ‘King Lear’: essays in prismatic criticism. Heinemann Educational, London (1974).

61.

Taylor, G., Warren, M.: The Division of the kingdoms: Shakespeare’s two versions of King Lear. Clarendon Press, Oxford [Oxfordshire] (1983).

62.

Ellis, A.: Old age, masculinity, and early modern drama: comic elders on the Italian and Shakespearean stage. Ashgate, Farnham (2009).

63.

Adelman, J.: Suffocating mothers: fantasies of maternal origin in Shakespeare’s plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. Routledge, New York (1992).

64.

Michael Neill: ‘In Everything Illegitimate’: Imagining the Bastard in Renaissance Drama. The Yearbook of English Studies. 23, 270–292 (1993).

65.

Alfar, C.L.: Looking for Goneril and Regan. In: Privacy, domesticity, and women in early modern England. pp. 167–9. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants, U.K. (2003).

66.

Shakespearean sensations : experiencing literature in early modern England. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom (2015).

67.

Shakespeare, W., Neill, M.: Anthony and Cleopatra. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).

68.

Loomba, A.: The Imperial Romance of Anthony and Cleopatra. In: Shakespeare, Race, and Colonialism. pp. 112–134. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002).

69.

Kahn, C.: Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. Routledge, London (1997).

70.

Bloom, H.: William Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra. Chelsea House, New York (1988).

71.

Stanton, K.: Shakespeare’s ’whores’ : erotics, politics and poetics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).

72.

Shakespeare, W., Orgel, S.: The winter’s tale. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996).

73.

Thorne, A.: Shakespeare’s romances. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2003).

74.

McMullan, G.: Shakespeare and the idea of late writing: authorship in the proximity of death. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).

75.

Adelman, J.: Suffocating mothers: fantasies of maternal origin in Shakespeare’s plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. Routledge, New York (1992).

76.

Neely, C.T.: Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1993).

77.

Walter S. H. Lim: Knowledge and Belief in ‘The Winter’s Tale’. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 41, 317–334 (2001).

78.

Leggatt, A.: Shakespeare’s tragedies: violation and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).

79.

Deborah Willis: ‘The Gnawing Vulture’: Revenge, Trauma Theory, and ‘Titus Andronicus’. Shakespeare Quarterly. 53, 21–52 (2002).

80.

Shakespeare, W., Bate, J.: Titus Andronicus. The Arden Shakespeare/Thomson Learning, London (2006).

81.

Zander, H.: Julius Caesar: new critical essays. Routledge, New York (2005).

82.

Wills, G., ebrary, Inc: Rome and rhetoric: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (2011).

83.

Shakespeare, W.: Much ado about nothing. Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, London (2016).

84.

Cook, A.J.: Making a Match: Courtship in Shakespeare and His Society. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2014).

85.

Neely, C.T.: Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1993).

86.

Cook, C.: ‘The Sign and Semblance of Her Honor’: Reading Gender Difference in Much Ado about Nothing. PMLA. 101, (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/462403.

87.

Kingsley-Smith, J.: ‘Hereafter, in a Better World Than This’: The End of Exile in As You Like It and King Lear. In: Shakespeare’s drama of exile. pp. 106–136. Macmillan, London (2003).

88.

Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive | by Michael John Goodman, https://shakespeareillustration.org/.