1.
Shakespeare W. The Norton Shakespeare [Internet]. Third Edition. Greenblatt S, Cohen W, Gossett S, Howard JE, Maus KE, McMullan G, editors. New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 2016. Available from: https://app.kortext.com/borrow/213586
2.
Cousins AD, Derrin D, editors. Shakespeare and the soliloquy in early modern English drama [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5473051
3.
Shakespeare W, Greenblatt S, Cohen W, Gossett S, Howard JE, Maus KE, et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Comedies. 3rd edition. New York: W. W. Norton; 2016.
4.
Shakespeare W, Greenblatt S, Cohen W, Gossett S, Howard JE, Maus KE, et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Tragedies. 3rd edition. New York: W. W. Norton; 2016.
5.
Shakespeare W, Greenblatt S, Cohen W, Gossett S, Howard JE, Maus KE, et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Histories. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton; 2016.
6.
Shakespeare W, Greenblatt S, Cohen W, Gossett S, Howard JE, Maus KE, et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Romances and poems. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton; 2016.
7.
Gabriel Egan. The New Oxford Shakespeare: Complete Set: Modern Critical Edition, Critical Reference Edition, Authorship Companion [Internet]. OUP Oxford; Critical edition; 27AD. Available from: https://www.amazon.co.uk/New-Oxford-Shakespeare-Reference-Authorship/dp/0198791321/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1547594552&sr=8-2&keywords=new+oxford+shakespeare+terri+bourus
8.
Shakespeare W, Greenblatt S, Cohen W, Howard JE, Maus KE, Gurr A. The Norton Shakespeare: based on the Oxford edition. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton; 2008.
9.
Wells SW, Orlin LC. Shakespeare: an Oxford guide. Vol. An Oxford guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
10.
Smith E. Cambridge introduction to Shakespeare [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge introductions to literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available from: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Roehampton&isbn=9780511321368&uid=^u
11.
Erne L. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist. 2nd ed. Cambridge: New York; 2013.
12.
Ryan K. Shakespeare [Internet]. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2002. Available from: https://web-a-ebscohost-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=43750cbe-f60b-44f0-8801-f837b890d96f%40sessionmgr4008&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=78756&db=nlebk
13.
Margreta de Grazia and Peter Stallybrass. The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text. Shakespeare Quarterly [Internet]. 1993;44(3):255–83. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2871419?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
14.
Palfrey S, Stern T. Shakespeare in parts [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=415764
15.
Smith EJ. Shakespeare’s First Folio : four centuries of an iconic book. Oxford: Open University Press; 2016.
16.
Franssen P. Shakespeare’s literary lives : theauthor as character in fiction andfilm [Internet]. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2016. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316410851
17.
Archer JEG. Intellectual and cultural world ofthe early modern Inns of Court. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2011.
18.
Shakespeare W, Bate J. Titus Andronicus. London: The Arden Shakespeare/Thomson Learning; 2006.
19.
Miola RS. Shakespeare’s Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983.
20.
Aebischer P. Shakespeare’s violated bodies: stage and screen performance. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
21.
Chernaik WL. The myth of Rome in Shakespeare and his contemporaries [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10470742
22.
Kahn C. Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1997. Available from: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=170363
23.
Deborah Willis. ‘The Gnawing Vulture’: Revenge, Trauma Theory, and ‘Titus Andronicus’. Shakespeare Quarterly [Internet]. 2002;53(1):21–52. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3844038?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
24.
Leggatt A. Shakespeare’s tragedies: violation and identity [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483660
25.
Miola RS. Shakespeare’s Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983.
26.
Chernaik WL. The myth of Rome in Shakespeare and his contemporaries [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10470742
27.
Kahn C. Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1997. Available from: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=170363
28.
Zander H. Julius Caesar: new critical essays [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2005. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=241952
29.
Wills G, ebrary, Inc. Rome and rhetoric: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar [Internet]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2011. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10512355
30.
Shakespeare W. Much ado about nothing. Revised edition. McEachern C, editor. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare; 2016.
31.
Cook AJ. Making a Match: Courtship in Shakespeare and His Society [Internet]. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=791092&site=ehost-live
32.
Neely CT. Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. Illini Books ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1993.
33.
Cook C. ‘The Sign and Semblance of Her Honor’: Reading Gender Difference in Much Ado about Nothing. PMLA. 1986 Mar;101(2).
34.
Shakespeare W, Taylor G. Henry V. Vol. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
35.
Leggatt A. Shakespeare’s political drama: the history plays and the Roman plays. London: Routledge; 1988.
36.
Howard JE, Rackin P. Engendering a nation: a feminist account of Shakespeare’s English histories (electronic resource) [Internet]. Vol. Feminist readings of Shakespeare. London [England]: Routledge; 1997. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10057214
37.
Michael Neill. Broken English and Broken Irish: Nation, Language, and the Optic of Power in Shakespeare’s Histories. Shakespeare Quarterly [Internet]. 1994;45(1):1–32. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2871290?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
38.
Lawrence Danson. Henry V: King, Chorus, and Critics. Shakespeare Quarterly [Internet]. 1983;34(1):27–43. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2870218?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
39.
Olivier LO. Henry V. [UK]: ITV DVD; 2003.
40.
Shakespeare W, Thompson A, Taylor N. Hamlet. Vol. The Arden Shakespeare. Third series. London: Arden Shakespeare; 2006.
41.
Shakespeare W, Thompson A, Taylor N. Hamlet: the texts of 1603 and 1623. Vol. Arden Shakespeare. Third series. London: Arden Shakespeare; 2006.
42.
Shakespeare W. Hamlet. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
43.
Shakespeare W, Thompson (Ed) A, Taylor (Ed) N. Hamlet (The First Folio, 1623) (electronic resource) [Internet]. Vol. Arden Shakespeare. Third series, Hamlet: the texts of 1603 and 1623. London: Arden Shakespeare; 2006. Available from: http://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/plays/hamlet-iid-127865
44.
Shakespeare W, Thompson (Ed) A, Taylor (Ed) N. Hamlet (The First Quarto; 1603) (electronic resource). In: Hamlet: the texts of 1603 and 1623 [Internet]. London: Arden; 2006. Available from: http://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/plays/hamlet-iid-127846
45.
Shakespeare W, Thompson (Ed) A, Taylor (Ed) N. Hamlet (The Second Quarto, 1604–05) (electronic resource) [Internet]. Vol. The Arden Shakespeare. Third series, Hamlet. London: Arden Shakespeare; 2006. Available from: http://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/plays/hamlet-iid-121359
46.
Thompson A. Hamlet: A Critical Reader. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2016.
47.
Mercer P. Hamlet and the acting of revenge. Vol. Contemporary interpretations of Shakespeare. London: Macmillan; 1987.
48.
Greenblatt S. Hamlet in purgatory (electronic resource) [Internet]. [New] edition. Vol. Princeton classics. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013. Available from: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1275329
49.
Thornton Burnett M. The Heart of the Mystery: Hamlet and Secrets. In: New essays on Hamlet. New York: AMS Press; 1994. p. 21–46.
50.
Pirie D. Hamlet without the Prince. Critical Quarterly. 1972;14(4):293–314.
51.
Cousins AD; D. Shakespeare and the soliloquy in early modern English drama [Internet]. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2018. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5473051
52.
Parker PA, Hartman GH. Shakespeare and the question of theory (electronic resource) [Internet]. New York: Methuen; 1985. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10097432
53.
Shakespeare W, Snyder S. All’s well that ends well. Vol. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1993.
54.
Ure P. William Shakespeare: the problem plays -Troilus and Cressida - all’s well that ends well - Measure for Measure - Timon of Athens. Vol. Writers and their work. London: Published for The British Council and The National Book League by Longman; 1964.
55.
Thomas V. The moral universe of Shakespeare’s problem plays. London: Croom Helm; 1987.
56.
David McCandless. Helena’s Bed-trick: Gender and Performance in All’s Well That Ends Well. Shakespeare Quarterly [Internet]. 1994;45(4):449–68. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2870966?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
57.
Muir K, International Shakespeare Conference. Shakespeare survey: an annual survey of Shakespearian study & production, 22. London: Cambridge U.P; 1969.
58.
Shakespeare W, Foakes RA. King Lear (electronic resource) [Internet]. New ed. Vol. The Arden Shakespeare. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson; 1997. Available from: http://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/plays/king-lear-iid-130992
59.
Kingsley-Smith J. ‘Hereafter, in a Better World Than This’: The End of Exile in As You Like It and King Lear. In: Shakespeare’s drama of exile [Internet]. London: Macmillan; 2003. p. 106–36. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=549ab7ae-f34a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
60.
Colie RL, Flahiff FT. Some facets of ‘King Lear’: essays in prismatic criticism. London: Heinemann Educational; 1974.
61.
Taylor G, Warren M. The Division of the kingdoms: Shakespeare’s two versions of King Lear. Vol. Oxford Shakespeare studies. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Clarendon Press; 1983.
62.
Ellis A. Old age, masculinity, and early modern drama: comic elders on the Italian and Shakespearean stage. Vol. Anglo-Italian Renaissance studies series. Farnham: Ashgate; 2009.
63.
Adelman J. Suffocating mothers: fantasies of maternal origin in Shakespeare’s plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. New York: Routledge; 1992.
64.
Michael Neill. ‘In Everything Illegitimate’: Imagining the Bastard in Renaissance Drama. The Yearbook of English Studies [Internet]. 1993;23:270–92. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3507984?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
65.
Alfar CL. Looking for Goneril and Regan. In: Privacy, domesticity, and women in early modern England. Aldershot, Hants, U.K.: Ashgate; 2003. p. 167–9.
66.
Shakespearean sensations : experiencing literature in early modern England. First paperback edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
67.
Shakespeare W, Neill M. Anthony and Cleopatra. Vol. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
68.
Loomba A. The Imperial Romance of Anthony and Cleopatra. In: Shakespeare, Race, and Colonialism [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 112–34. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6714d9d4-4ad4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
69.
Kahn C. Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. Vol. Feminist readings of Shakespeare. London: Routledge; 1997.
70.
Bloom H. William Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra. New York: Chelsea House; 1988.
71.
Stanton K. Shakespeare’s ’whores’ : erotics, politics and poetics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014.
72.
Shakespeare W, Orgel S. The winter’s tale. Vol. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
73.
Thorne A. Shakespeare’s romances. Vol. New casebooks. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003.
74.
McMullan G. Shakespeare and the idea of late writing: authorship in the proximity of death [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483790
75.
Adelman J. Suffocating mothers: fantasies of maternal origin in Shakespeare’s plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. New York: Routledge; 1992.
76.
Neely CT. Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. Illini Books ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1993.
77.
Walter S. H. Lim. Knowledge and Belief in ‘The Winter’s Tale’. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 [Internet]. 2001;41(2):317–34. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1556191?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
78.
Leggatt A. Shakespeare’s tragedies: violation and identity [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483660
79.
Deborah Willis. ‘The Gnawing Vulture’: Revenge, Trauma Theory, and ‘Titus Andronicus’. Shakespeare Quarterly [Internet]. 2002;53(1):21–52. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3844038?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
80.
Shakespeare W, Bate J. Titus Andronicus. London: The Arden Shakespeare/Thomson Learning; 2006.
81.
Zander H. Julius Caesar: new critical essays [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2005. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-ebooks/detail.action?docID=241952
82.
Wills G, ebrary, Inc. Rome and rhetoric: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar [Internet]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2011. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/roehampton/Doc?id=10512355
83.
Shakespeare W. Much ado about nothing. Revised edition. McEachern C, editor. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare; 2016.
84.
Cook AJ. Making a Match: Courtship in Shakespeare and His Society [Internet]. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=791092&site=ehost-live
85.
Neely CT. Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. Illini Books ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1993.
86.
Cook C. ‘The Sign and Semblance of Her Honor’: Reading Gender Difference in Much Ado about Nothing. PMLA. 1986 Mar;101(2).
87.
Kingsley-Smith J. ‘Hereafter, in a Better World Than This’: The End of Exile in As You Like It and King Lear. In: Shakespeare’s drama of exile [Internet]. London: Macmillan; 2003. p. 106–36. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=549ab7ae-f34a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
88.
Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive | by Michael John Goodman [Internet]. Available from: https://shakespeareillustration.org/