1.
Shakespeare, W. The Norton Shakespeare. (W.W. Norton & Company, 2016).
2.
Shakespeare and the soliloquy in early modern English drama. (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
3.
Shakespeare, W. et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Comedies. (W. W. Norton, 2016).
4.
Shakespeare, W. et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Tragedies. (W. W. Norton, 2016).
5.
Shakespeare, W. et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Histories. (W. W. Norton, 2016).
6.
Shakespeare, W. et al. The Norton Shakespeare: Romances and poems. (W. W. Norton, 2016).
7.
Gabriel Egan. The New Oxford Shakespeare: Complete Set: Modern Critical Edition, Critical Reference Edition, Authorship Companion. (OUP Oxford; Critical edition, 27AD).
8.
Shakespeare, W. et al. The Norton Shakespeare: based on the Oxford edition. (W. W. Norton, 2008).
9.
Wells, S. W. & Orlin, L. C. Shakespeare: an Oxford guide. vol. An Oxford guide (Oxford University Press, 2003).
10.
Smith, E. Cambridge introduction to Shakespeare. vol. Cambridge introductions to literature (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
11.
Erne, L. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist. (New York, 2013).
12.
Ryan, K. Shakespeare. (Palgrave, 2002).
13.
Margreta de Grazia and Peter Stallybrass. The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text. Shakespeare Quarterly 44, 255–283 (1993).
14.
Palfrey, S. & Stern, T. Shakespeare in parts. (Oxford University Press, 2007).
15.
Smith, E. J. Shakespeare’s First Folio : four centuries of an iconic book. (Open University Press, 2016).
16.
Franssen, P. Shakespeare’s literary lives : theauthor as character in fiction andfilm. (Cambridge University Press, 2016).
17.
Archer, J. E. G. Intellectual and cultural world ofthe early modern Inns of Court. (Manchester University Press, 2011).
18.
Shakespeare, W. & Bate, J. Titus Andronicus. (The Arden Shakespeare/Thomson Learning, 2006).
19.
Miola, R. S. Shakespeare’s Rome. (Cambridge University Press, 1983).
20.
Aebischer, P. Shakespeare’s violated bodies: stage and screen performance. (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
21.
Chernaik, W. L. The myth of Rome in Shakespeare and his contemporaries. (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
22.
Kahn, C. Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. (Routledge, 1997).
23.
Deborah Willis. ‘The Gnawing Vulture’: Revenge, Trauma Theory, and ‘Titus Andronicus’. Shakespeare Quarterly 53, 21–52 (2002).
24.
Leggatt, A. Shakespeare’s tragedies: violation and identity. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
25.
Miola, R. S. Shakespeare’s Rome. (Cambridge University Press, 1983).
26.
Chernaik, W. L. The myth of Rome in Shakespeare and his contemporaries. (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
27.
Kahn, C. Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. (Routledge, 1997).
28.
Zander, H. Julius Caesar: new critical essays. (Routledge, 2005).
29.
Wills, G. & ebrary, Inc. Rome and rhetoric: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. (Yale University Press, 2011).
30.
Shakespeare, W. Much ado about nothing. (Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2016).
31.
Cook, A. J. Making a Match: Courtship in Shakespeare and His Society. (Princeton University Press, 2014).
32.
Neely, C. T. Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. (University of Illinois Press, 1993).
33.
Cook, C. ‘The Sign and Semblance of Her Honor’: Reading Gender Difference in Much Ado about Nothing. PMLA 101, (1986).
34.
Shakespeare, W. & Taylor, G. Henry V. vol. The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford University Press, 2008).
35.
Leggatt, A. Shakespeare’s political drama: the history plays and the Roman plays. (Routledge, 1988).
36.
Howard, J. E. & Rackin, P. Engendering a nation: a feminist account of Shakespeare’s English histories (electronic resource). vol. Feminist readings of Shakespeare (Routledge, 1997).
37.
Michael Neill. Broken English and Broken Irish: Nation, Language, and the Optic of Power in Shakespeare’s Histories. Shakespeare Quarterly 45, 1–32 (1994).
38.
Lawrence Danson. Henry V: King, Chorus, and Critics. Shakespeare Quarterly 34, 27–43 (1983).
39.
Olivier, L. O. Henry V. (2003).
40.
Shakespeare, W., Thompson, A. & Taylor, N. Hamlet. vol. The Arden Shakespeare. Third series (Arden Shakespeare, 2006).
41.
Shakespeare, W., Thompson, A. & Taylor, N. Hamlet: the texts of 1603 and 1623. vol. Arden Shakespeare. Third series (Arden Shakespeare, 2006).
42.
Shakespeare, W. Hamlet. (Oxford University Press, 2008).
43.
Shakespeare, W., Thompson (Ed), A. & Taylor (Ed), N. Hamlet (The First Folio, 1623) (electronic resource). Hamlet: the texts of 1603 and 1623 vol. Arden Shakespeare. Third series (Arden Shakespeare, 2006).
44.
Shakespeare, W., Thompson (Ed), A. & Taylor (Ed), N. Hamlet (The First Quarto; 1603) (electronic resource). in Hamlet: the texts of 1603 and 1623 vol. Arden Shakespeare. Third series (Arden, 2006).
45.
Shakespeare, W., Thompson (Ed), A. & Taylor (Ed), N. Hamlet (The Second Quarto, 1604–05) (electronic resource). Hamlet vol. The Arden Shakespeare. Third series (Arden Shakespeare, 2006).
46.
Thompson, A. Hamlet: A Critical Reader. (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016).
47.
Mercer, P. Hamlet and the acting of revenge. vol. Contemporary interpretations of Shakespeare (Macmillan, 1987).
48.
Greenblatt, S. Hamlet in purgatory (electronic resource). vol. Princeton classics (Princeton University Press, 2013).
49.
Thornton Burnett, M. The Heart of the Mystery: Hamlet and Secrets. in New essays on Hamlet vol. The Hamlet collection 21–46 (AMS Press, 1994).
50.
Pirie, D. Hamlet without the Prince. Critical Quarterly 14, 293–314 (1972).
51.
Cousins, A. D. ; D. Shakespeare and the soliloquy in early modern English drama. (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
52.
Parker, P. A. & Hartman, G. H. Shakespeare and the question of theory (electronic resource). (Methuen, 1985).
53.
Shakespeare, W. & Snyder, S. All’s well that ends well. vol. The Oxford Shakespeare (Clarendon Press, 1993).
54.
Ure, P. William Shakespeare: the problem plays -Troilus and Cressida - all’s well that ends well - Measure for Measure - Timon of Athens. vol. Writers and their work (Published for The British Council and The National Book League by Longman, 1964).
55.
Thomas, V. The moral universe of Shakespeare’s problem plays. (Croom Helm, 1987).
56.
David McCandless. Helena’s Bed-trick: Gender and Performance in All’s Well That Ends Well. Shakespeare Quarterly 45, 449–468 (1994).
57.
Muir, K. & International Shakespeare Conference. Shakespeare survey: an annual survey of Shakespearian study & production, 22. (Cambridge U.P, 1969).
58.
Shakespeare, W. & Foakes, R. A. King Lear (electronic resource). vol. The Arden Shakespeare (Nelson, 1997).
59.
Kingsley-Smith, J. ‘Hereafter, in a Better World Than This’: The End of Exile in As You Like It and King Lear. in Shakespeare’s drama of exile 106–136 (Macmillan, 2003).
60.
Colie, R. L. & Flahiff, F. T. Some facets of ‘King Lear’: essays in prismatic criticism. (Heinemann Educational, 1974).
61.
Taylor, G. & Warren, M. The Division of the kingdoms: Shakespeare’s two versions of King Lear. vol. Oxford Shakespeare studies (Clarendon Press, 1983).
62.
Ellis, A. Old age, masculinity, and early modern drama: comic elders on the Italian and Shakespearean stage. vol. Anglo-Italian Renaissance studies series (Ashgate, 2009).
63.
Adelman, J. Suffocating mothers: fantasies of maternal origin in Shakespeare’s plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. (Routledge, 1992).
64.
Michael Neill. ‘In Everything Illegitimate’: Imagining the Bastard in Renaissance Drama. The Yearbook of English Studies 23, 270–292 (1993).
65.
Alfar, C. L. Looking for Goneril and Regan. in Privacy, domesticity, and women in early modern England 167–9 (Ashgate, 2003).
66.
Shakespearean sensations : experiencing literature in early modern England. (Cambridge University Press, 2015).
67.
Shakespeare, W. & Neill, M. Anthony and Cleopatra. vol. The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford University Press, 2008).
68.
Loomba, A. The Imperial Romance of Anthony and Cleopatra. in Shakespeare, Race, and Colonialism vol. Oxford Shakespeare topics 112–134 (Oxford University Press, 2002).
69.
Kahn, C. Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. vol. Feminist readings of Shakespeare (Routledge, 1997).
70.
Bloom, H. William Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra. (Chelsea House, 1988).
71.
Stanton, K. Shakespeare’s ’whores’ : erotics, politics and poetics. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).
72.
Shakespeare, W. & Orgel, S. The winter’s tale. vol. The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford University Press, 1996).
73.
Thorne, A. Shakespeare’s romances. vol. New casebooks (Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).
74.
McMullan, G. Shakespeare and the idea of late writing: authorship in the proximity of death. (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
75.
Adelman, J. Suffocating mothers: fantasies of maternal origin in Shakespeare’s plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. (Routledge, 1992).
76.
Neely, C. T. Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. (University of Illinois Press, 1993).
77.
Walter S. H. Lim. Knowledge and Belief in ‘The Winter’s Tale’. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 41, 317–334 (2001).
78.
Leggatt, A. Shakespeare’s tragedies: violation and identity. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
79.
Deborah Willis. ‘The Gnawing Vulture’: Revenge, Trauma Theory, and ‘Titus Andronicus’. Shakespeare Quarterly 53, 21–52 (2002).
80.
Shakespeare, W. & Bate, J. Titus Andronicus. (The Arden Shakespeare/Thomson Learning, 2006).
81.
Zander, H. Julius Caesar: new critical essays. (Routledge, 2005).
82.
Wills, G. & ebrary, Inc. Rome and rhetoric: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. (Yale University Press, 2011).
83.
Shakespeare, W. Much ado about nothing. (Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2016).
84.
Cook, A. J. Making a Match: Courtship in Shakespeare and His Society. (Princeton University Press, 2014).
85.
Neely, C. T. Broken nuptials in Shakespeare’s plays. (University of Illinois Press, 1993).
86.
Cook, C. ‘The Sign and Semblance of Her Honor’: Reading Gender Difference in Much Ado about Nothing. PMLA 101, (1986).
87.
Kingsley-Smith, J. ‘Hereafter, in a Better World Than This’: The End of Exile in As You Like It and King Lear. in Shakespeare’s drama of exile 106–136 (Macmillan, 2003).
88.
Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive | by Michael John Goodman. https://shakespeareillustration.org/.